|
May we suggest
that you make use of the e-mail to replace the guestbook to
correspond with
us?
Posting
Problems
Visitor's
Request
Thank you for visiting
our site
================================
Click here for ALERT!
================================
Also, examine how and why we deal
with certain judges harshly in our
comments:
See
Reasonable
Response
Events
from May 1, 2005
CALENDAR OF
EVENTS
Events of
2005
For Events
Before May 4 of 2005, Click Here.
For
Events After January 13 of 2006,
Click Here
NOTE
While we focus on a number of events that have
great significance, we must of necessity become somewhat
selective because of time restraints. Indeed, most events do
need to be set into proper perspective and we feel tension
when by necessity we must pass over some of them, but
appreciate your understanding and forbearance. We do continue to
examine our predicament and will strive to improve with time.
We wish to add also that we continue to be open to your
suggestions as a valuable
resource.
January
13, 2006
The
Delaying Game
Judge Samuel A. Alito, Jr.,
certainly faces an indignant, obstinate and perhaps even
sadistic core of pompous opponents who do not easily concede
to reason, light or intelligence. Even though this core
has been unsuccessful at sabotaging the efforts to move toward
an up or down vote in the full Senate, they have resorted to
the most rigorous of schemes involving every conceivable
underhanded tactic to make Judge Alito appear to be unfit and
tainted with questionable judicial tendencies.
However, since this hard core cannot turn
up any real dirt in the history of this respected judge, these
vultures swarm to grab at a straw, that of fighting to delay
the final outcome in a desperate hope that some hidden
character flaw may lie behind some obscure closet
door.
Perhaps this little fictitious skit
may shed a bit of
light on the nature and character of the Senate process with
respect to the nominating procedures.
January
9, 2006
The
Year Ahead
Here we must pick up the pieces and
wage a heavy warfare.
The enemies of truth, decency, morality, ethical
concerns, Christian principles, etc. have truly initiated an
all-out offensive such that an excessively hostile environment
for Christians and family values underpins the judicial
decisions on many fronts. Much of the courts’
political and philosophical perspectives targets the values we
hold dear.
Interestingly, some of us have
heard a roaring protest among certain Christian groups to draw
into our shells and leave the political processes alone. The cry goes something
like this: “Don’t
mix religion and
politics!”
Some people are naïve and/or
ignorant.
Appeasement has never historically achieved anything
less than repression and persecution. The same thing applies
to the silence of the Church during a day we should be as a
roaring lion, demanding that our nation revert to the decent
constitutional government upon which our nation was
founded. God has
provided us who belong to Him a talent, an opportunity through
the exercise of voice and vote to change the course of history
toward the better.
To refuse to use that talent or to bury it leaves us
altogether vulnerable.
We
need to exercise our God-given rights to establish our nation
to the glory and honor of God. This means that we
should be concerned for the appointment of constructionist
judges, those who uphold the Constitution of the
United
States.
May
we encourage our Congress to provide a simple up or down vote
on these judicial nominees as they come before Congress. Judge
Samuel A. Alito, Jr. deserves at least that. The nomination should
never have the veto of the minority to rule out a vote on a
nomination.
May we all take heed.
December
25, 2005
MERRY
CHRISTMAS
We wish all our visitors and their families and
friends a very Merry Christmas
indeed!
May the coming year of 2006 be
filled with the genuine Christmas spirit, such that our nation
will become a nation driven by the mighty force of God’s love,
rather than an onslaught against Christianity, moral and
ethical principles and family values in general. It’s high time
that we as Christians take a stand, draw a line in the sand
and declare in no uncertain terms, “No further will we
compromise, but rather, we will stand for what is
right!”
December
22, 2005
Year
in Review
Here we are at Christmas time, the
year almost gone.
We may well ask, “Where is the peace the
Prince of peace sought to bring to earth some two thousand
years ago?”
As we review the year of 2005, we
can scarcely escape the shock that the breach between the
forces of light and darkness has been
fiercely expanding during the year. Christianity dwells in
a land of growing hostilities, though yet compared to some
other areas of the world still has more opportunities to cry
out against injustice and moral and spiritual decadence. While right has
prevailed in certain areas of our judicial, legislative and
executive dispositions, we yet have great challenges demanding
our resolve.
Two
distinct offenses determine the battle strategies toward
undermining Christian and family values in our beloved
society. First,
the credibility gap leaves us on shaky ground with
respect to determining the course of response. Political
correctness and elitist courts’ legislative
decisions have all but banned any hope to find avenues to
appeal. The
Pennsylvania
appeals judge declared that a school district could not even
mention the possibility that students could explore other
theories of origins beyond the theory of evolution, including
intelligent design. From this elitist
judge came the mandate that we all must resign thinking for
ourselves and look to the elitists to tell us what to think
and what to believe.
Research must be out of the
question.
Then, some go so
far as to promote a philosophy with a grossly distorted
perspective that religion must not bear any influence or
declaration except within the privacy of meetings or
homes. Such a
perversion through what is erroneously called
separation of church and state prevails
among the anti-Christian forces, such as some of the courts
and groups like the ACLU,
True, we have won some and lost
some, but our losses should never become a signal to throw in
the towel.
Our nation is worth fighting for, is it
not?
December
11, 2005
Where
Have We Been?
First, we apologize for our absence
on the web. We
have been in a transitional period during which time we had to
secure another web address. In addition, we had to
set up the site and allow enough time to make sure that all
aspects had been prepared and successfully dealt
with.
Now that we have accomplished
that, we will be using this site to post updates in news,
etc.
We appreciate your patience
with us during this time.
November
14, 2005
What’s
Wrong with this Picture?
The news media pounced perniciously
upon the revelation from the records turning up with respect
to Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito’s argument that “the
Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion.” Beg tell
just what is wrong with this
picture?
Can any judicial activists turn up one shred of
evidence from the Constitution itself
that outright torture and murder of innocent, unborn children
must reside as a right for the mothers to decide? Just wherein does the
Constitution pose the notion that the rights of one
group of people can trump the rights of another group
of people? If our
practices resemble precisely the death house procedures, the
execution of men, women and children of an identified group
(or ethnic background) of Adolph Hitler’s Germany during the
inception of World War II, then how dare we become so
excessively hypocritical as to condemn and judge those who
engineered and executed those atrocities! A mindless, arrogant
declaration that one set of atrocities can be justified and
the other set of atrocities must be condemned demands outright
contempt.
November
13, 2005
Signs
of the Times
A grim and ominous foreshadowing
has gripped our awareness during this moment of
reversals. Our
high hopes that our nation was beginning to show a glimmer of
breaking away from the sinister, evil grips of the movement to
wrest our nation from its heritage and supplant our democracy
with judicial tyranny has suffered a serious setback.
California
voters have narrowly defeated attempts to keep parents in
control of their children and awarded school children to state
control during school hours. It’s a very
dangerous trend that can lead to abusive brainwashing and
promotion of an anti-Christian, anti-parental and
anti-American mindset.
Furthermore, parental notification for teen abortions
also fell by the wayside. Can this
be a sign that California
has already fallen from the ranks of
America
through hostile rejection of unique and distinct American
values? Such voters have
given new impetus to the California
courts.
Added elsewhere in our nation to
this catastrophe in California, the ousting of all the
educational board members in this certain school district who
supported an honest acknowledgement that evolution
provided only one theory to account for the origin of all
living matter and that Intelligent Design
theory, which, in many respects, finds a basis in
reality with feasible support, could be mentioned as another
theory that students could research on their own, if so
inclined.
Obviously, these board members proved far too honest to
receive the support of bigoted and biased
voters!
Yet, this demonic tarnish will
never cause us to throw in the towel. We intend to promote
the truth and allow the truth to be our
defense.
October
27, 2005
New
Revelations Concerning the
Military
Most Christian chaplains within military service have
been restricted from free exercise of their firmly held
religious convictions, a ruthless censorship of religious
liberty. This
practice has been around for some number of years but has been
brought to the forefront by those of us deeply concerned for
the direction of this evil cloud threatening the very
existence of Christian liberties. These Chaplains can not even
end a prayer in the name of Jesus! (See
ACLJ as one of several good
source for further details)
September
29, 2005
New
Chief Justice, John Roberts
We joyfully congratulate Chief
Justice, John Roberts.
We feel that he will certainly vindicate our confidence
and trust in him through the execution of responsibilities in
his new role.
September
25, 2005
Rita’s
Aftermath
Hurricane Rita could scarcely be
ignored or dismissed simply because it did not unleash quite
the devastation of hurricane Katrina. Measured by some other
scales, hurricane Rita caused widespread damage through wind
and flooding, though it did not measure up to the excesses of
hurricane Katrina.
Yet, hurricane Rita proved to be a very dangerous and
risky monster. It
seems that its landfall location had much to do with
minimizing loss, though it nevertheless inflicted some
widespread damage.
We must express our sympathy to
those who indeed suffered heavy personal losses, many having
no homes to which to return and others burdened heavily with
prospects of costly repairs. While the loss of even one human life can never be
replaced, we can receive some consolation in the loss of far
fewer lives from hurricane Rita than with hurricane
Katrina.
September
17, 2005
Another
So-called Establishment
Clause Ruling
We’re
scarcely overcome with shock, unfortunately! But we can still be
overcome with anger anyway. It cannot be a
surprise coming from California’s excessively liberal
quagmire that the court has ruled the pledge of
allegiance to be unconstitutional. Yet, most of us would
delight for these scorpion judges to yawn in error and render
a decent decision now and then. Nevertheless, any hint
of falling back upon the Judeo-Christian tradition of our
forefathers can never cross the minds of renegade judges bent
toward such brutal anti-Christian hostilities.
The
very fact that a reference to God should receive censorship
based on a flimsy, petty claim that anything even suggesting
endorsement of a religious sect could be applied to the
mention of deity borders on total insanity. Now, a case could
certainly gain teeth if such wording held one nation, under
the Baptists or one nation under the Catholics,
etc. became a part of the pledge of allegiance.
Yet,
the pledge of allegiance has never been made mandatory
within the schools or elsewhere. That should certainly
be the case, but that within and of itself alone has not
satisfied the bigoted judges who obviously delight in any
means possible at their sordid command to slap Christianity in
the face.
Christianity has never been the enemy of
democracy, but those who are surreptitiously enemies of
democracy would delight in destroying Christianity through any
and all means possible.
As an old professor used to say, “Now put that in
your pipes and smoke it!”
See Reasonable
Response
September
3, 2005
The
Haughty and Smug Assault
God’s mercy never ceases to amaze many of
us. He allows the
most vicious and vile onslaught from the deepest darkness,
deception and rampage created by the forces of evil that
stagger the most comprehensive imagination
possible.
Take for example the branding of truth
and light
as the extreme
right.
But, we suppose, it all depends on
perspective. If a
person lives in the circumference of a filthy, slimy garbage
dump and measures all life by filth and slime, that which is
decent, vibrant, true and good introduce elements of
intolerance into his environment. He reels in raging
rebellion. He
calls these elements extreme and unacceptable.
The truth of the matter spills forth in
the deceptive selection of code words which cleverly
conceal the audacious and malicious intent to deceive. Take for example
the code word privacy. Of course, these
certain organizations determined to disqualify John Roberts
for consideration as a justice of the Supreme Court of the
United States no longer depend on resorting to the terms abortion or gay rights or any
sensitive term which might turn people off, but link these
dastard undercover tactics to the code word privacy. Of course, the right of privacy never
once appears in the Declaration of
Independence
or the
Constitution of the United
States. Such reference
originated in the Supreme Court as a convenient invention to
forge such atrocities against humanity as abortion on
demand.
Privacy
must indeed be considered a practice deemed to
protect legitimate rights, such that no organization or
persons intrude without just cause into the practice of any
citizen to enjoy entitled rights of property, speech, personal
choices and peace within the rightful domain of his own home
and affairs. But
if any of us considers privacy
to include murder of innocent, unborn babies,
then we by the same principle can justify other murders, bank
robberies, etc., to be protected under privacy!
The playing field must be level
that every person and cause be equally engaged. Let us all see through
the darkness to the real issues and practices.
September
1, 2005
The
Mighty Winds Stir up the Greatest Physical
Challenges
The
ravages of hurricane Katrina
have come and gone, but the shock left
in the wake tells a never-ending story. Thousands succumb to
the dreaded aftermath, many dying with a painful, lonely and
heartbreaking conclusion, never even having the satisfaction
of knowing loved ones and friends would make it to
safety. Others
wonder whether this ordeal will find any end at all.
But out of the darkness, like
some spark of radiant hope, comes the encouraging presence of
those who have discovered an inner peace and purpose which
cannot be blurred by any adverse circumstances. These people will
never surrender, as with a lady quietly and confidently
proclaiming that her God provided surety and abiding
hope. Still
others moved like peaceful reminders that some found
fulfillment in providing whatever comfort and encouragement to
others that opportunity would allow.
On and on the stories
go. But we shall
remain in prayer, for the total tragedy will never completely
fade from our hearts and never be forgotten in
history.
August
31, 2005
The
Catastrophe Across the
Gulf
Coast
Hurricane Katrina turned out to be
more than a feisty little kitten. People who survived
along a stretch of the Gulf Coast including New Orleans, which
suffered, among other things, flooding of 80% of the city
itself, can testify to the devastation and loss, not only
property, but much worse. Many people
perished. The
exact numbers may never be known, but the sense of the tragedy
can never be eradicated!
Our prayers and support go out to
those who suffered great loss. We add our expressions
of care and remember those who suffered through several
hurricanes. Any
tragedy, no matter how many or how few lives have been
scarred, calls us to reflect on the fragility and uncertainty
of life here, but God does care. He expressed that care
in the suffering and death of Jesus Christ.
God bless every one who suffers
such tragedy. May
such experiences become an opportunity for each one to look to
the One who really cares to receive comfort and
hope.
August
25, 2005
To
be Credible, Must the People’s Voice Reflect People
for the American
Way’s
Views?
No matter how the rest of us feel (about fifty
percent of Americans oppose abortion on demand, close
to eighty percent of Americans oppose partial birth
abortion, etc.), an incredible distortion by People for
the American Way flagrantly declares that main stream
America can not include these so-called radical
Americans who oppose abortion on demand and partial birth
abortion (who, because of their belief, in reality
are main
stream)! Precisely because of this skewed claim by People
for the American Way, it appears to many of us that they
dare suggest omnipotence for themselves! Must all of us be
forced to bow and worship these egotistical, aloof, arrogant,
hostile and duplicitous anti-Christian, anti-democratic,
anti-social and malicious advocates? Come on. Give us a
break.
Furthermore, this group
has sought to debunk John Roberts from qualifying for the High
Court position because of his own stand which his records show
to be far more in keeping with much of what genuine
America
stands for!
Granted,
People for the American
Way reserves the right to voice their views, no matter how
inflammatory, askew and anti-constitutional such unrealistic
views may be.
They even have a right, as do the Communists, the
Fascists, the radical Islamic group or terrorists, to slam our
history with disdain, our belief in a true representative
government, our religious commitment, etc., but do
they reserve for themselves a right to slander others and
misrepresent them and deliberately seek to deceive many with
respect to their malicious intent? Do they have a right
to seek restrictions against Christians and decent political
figures and bar them from any political influence within the
course of our history just because they refuse to embrace this
organization?
We really think not. Why should they be the
only ones to speak with authority to purge our nation of any
group or persons who hold values and views that they
detest? It can be
no less than transparent that they recoil from truth and could
never sustain a credible interaction with all cards on the
table.
Granted,
too, they remain entitled to propagate their hatred of
truth just as long as they restrain themselves from weapons of
lies and misrepresentations of other groups which destroy a
level playing field to allow everyone an equal and fair
opportunity.
We challenge all groups to allow
John Roberts a fair and decent opportunity to present himself
to the American people before the
Senate.
August
16, 2005
The People’s Reflections on the
Gasoline Prices
Outrageous! Those imports are
ridiculous. Why
don’t we use our vast resources—like in
Alaska? We don’t have to be
held hostage to the oil producing enemies—or should I call
them allies? With
friends like those nations, who needs
enemies?
Oh, they use the hikes as
weapons against us.
They make us support their terrorism from their
enormous profits!
I really don’t know what to
say. I guess gas
prices go up like a lot of other things. We’ll just tighten our
belts and make it some way or
another.
Please DON’T MENTION GAS PRICES
TO ME! My
dandruff is already up and I don’t want to use bad
language. Let’s
just say that I hope those greedy savages all find a way to
destroy themselves without dragging anyone else into the pit
of hell with them.
Note: Realizing that tempers
can push some of us off the deep end, we nevertheless can find
a cord of understanding and sympathy with the concern many
people have. We
are indeed living in an unstable world in which the forces of
darkness continue to wage warfare. We need to pray for
our enemies, that the darkness which surrounds them will
dissipate.
August
13, 2005
The Credibility Gap
Onslaught
If we dare become a bit
introspective as a nation, we meet head-on with the credibility gap
trauma with respect to the unfounded accusations promoted by
certain pro-choice advocates in media ads. Judge John Roberts,
the target of this smear campaign, obviously has no hidden
pits of slime to be dug up, but has fallen victim to
unscrupulous attempts to debunk him through deception and
misleading statements.
This unconscionable effort has begun to backfire and
rightly so.
Now isn’t it far past due to start calling a
spade, a spade?
July
21, 2005
The
Main Stream America
Fable
If we scrutinize the notion that
President Bush’s selection of Judge John Roberts to fill the
vacancy on the United States Supreme Court does not tally with
main stream America, we are left with questions
concerning the application of a litmus test.
First,
who determines exactly what the main stream
America
is? There definitely
appears to be fairly broad interpretations among politically
minded legislators as to what exactly constitutes
main stream
America |
