|
Posting
Problems
Visitor's
Request
Thank you for visiting
our site
May
we suggest that you make use of the e-mail to
replace the guestbook to correspond with us?
================================
For Events
Before January 22 of 2006,
Click
Here
Focus on
Events from
January
22, 2006
December
5, 2006
What’s
Wrong with Ambassador John Bolton?
For one thing, Ambassador
John Bolton just doesn’t fit into this wimpy society,
especially the very liberal political arena!
He
won the admiration of Christian conservatives and those with
backbone, conviction and commitment and those who actually
stood for something in the midst of advocates for a bland,
pluralistic and permissive perspective grounded heavily in
secular materialism.
And, ladies and gentlemen, that posture alone placed
Ambassador John
Bolton in the crosshairs of such egotistical maniacs bent on
hostile assaults against their bitter enemy, Ambassador John
Bolton!
Furthermore,
Ambassador John Bolton dared to believe the reality of
right and wrong, black and white, good and evil and did
not hesitate to call a spade a spade. Within some very
powerful political circles in
Washington the expressions of such conviction brand Ambassador
John Bolton as a bigot and intolerant radical.
But, you know, some of
us would love to see more people with that kind of conviction
in today’s world, the kind of courage and statesmanship of our
forefathers. We grow tired and worry with the
kind of wimpy expressions with which we are bombarded in our
modern times!
Perhaps
some people within our society like to delve into the kind of
fantasy the president of
Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, brazenly
declared with respect to the Holocaust under Hitler’s
Germany.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad needs no
evidence, no kind of proof and no inkling of substantiation
whatsoever, for he himself remains the sole arbiter
through his words alone as to what is true and what is
false. No one
should dare question him. He even declares that
pictures and other evidence of such an event were created or
otherwise greatly exaggerated to produce deception. How does he know
this? But
wait. He does not
need to justify or support his words in any way since he
himself is the generator of
truth!
Many opponents of
Ambassador John Bolton cling to the fantasies of materialistic
naturalism which gives rise to relativism and pluralism. Such philosophical
perspectives scorn the notion of absolutes and create a
disdain for genuine Christian and family values. While it must be
understood that the government cannot disallow wimps to exist,
at the same time we must not allow such a principle to dictate
that those wimps must be granted rights that trump the rights
of others to exist!
December
1, 2006
What
About …mas?
This …mas season
should be a jolly good time.
Certain
groups seek to make that clear, especially since they do every
conceivable ploy, trick, litigation and intimidation humanly
possible to assure the total absence of Him whose birthday
gave origin to the season in the first place. But
really, should we be surprised at all? These groups make it
perfectly clear that their hostilities against Christ and all
He stands for remain transparent! It’s OK for the
Islamic religion to display its emblem proudly, as in
Chicago,
along beside the Jewish Star of David. But for Christians
to display a nativity scene creates an earthshaking roar of
indignant protests ending in litigation.
Excuse us who believe in reality, but
isn’t there something wrong with that picture? In other
words, such organizations as the ACLU, Americans United, etc.,
can pick and choose and by the claim to omnipotence
arbitrarily force everyone else to dance to their tune,
allowing other religious groups liberty to express themselves
simply on the grounds that they do not endorse Christianity or
they are even openly hostile toward Christians. How can
this be different from blatant and arrogant duplicity and
censorship?
We mean, tell us. Or just maybe an issue
can only be consider true merely by the fact the words are
uttered from the lips of the only real authority to
create truth by words alone, the ACLU and all its other
cohorts.
Of course, if Christians lay claims to rights, they
would be held up to the most vicious scrutiny and
unrelentingly subjected to counterclaims. Again, why
is it that Christians must eternally be expected to justify
the very hint of claims while the hostile enemies of
Christianity expect never to be required to justify any of
their claims?
Oh, well, we could go on and on for volumes, but
perhaps there remain enough decent people who already see what
is happening and who rely on the truth of the Scriptures,
If the world hates you, you know that
it hated Me [Christ] before it
hated you (John 15:18).
November 11, 2006
For focusing
on this past midterm election, please click
here:
The Brewing
Storms
November 2,
2006
An Election Year
Prayer
Our
God and Our
King,
At this election
year of 2006, help us to rely upon You and the fire of
Your Holy Power
and Inspiration that our eyes will see beyond the superficial
and the artificial.
Make us mindful of the trap the natural person tends to
ignore such that he easily becomes distracted to follow the
deceptive trails of self-embellishment that lead to rebellion
against God, truth, life and family values.
Yes, we would hold
these natural persons up to you that somehow You would give
them a keen sensitivity to their plight and help them turn to
the truth and commit themselves to vote for those who strongly
support Christian and family values, those who espouse life in
a culture of death, those who uphold the sanctity of true
marriage, those who are statesmen for the true values of our
forefathers, those who demonstrate a fervor for truth and
light in a society all too often exposed to shades of darkness
and relativism.
Help us, Oh, Lord,
our God, to use the talent through the voting booth You have
given us in our country to let our voice be heard loud and
clear. May we
rally as a mighty force of our God to turn our nation back
into the paths of righteousness. Give us
confidence in the God who has helped us heretofore to do the
impossible, for You are a God of the impossible! May we act in faith
that during this election year Our God will dissipate the
great darkness and continue to establish Christian and family
values in our society.
Yes, Lord, we
place our full confidence in You. You are the God Who
parted the Red
Sea to allow Your
people to cross on dry land. You are the God Who
toppled the walls of Jericho. You are the God Who
has done many and wondrous signs to express Your Power and
Authority. Yes,
even in the last general election You have helped our nation
to overcome the tide of the death march down the
road toward obliteration of religious liberties, unrestrained
sadistic murder of unborn children, including partial birth
abortion, assault on traditional marriage,
silencing Christian expressions, etc. Even though our
enemies continue to hamper our efforts to secure these
precious freedoms, they have not been able to halt our efforts
to gain a genuine legal standing to secure these
liberties. Would
You not only bring our enemies to defeat, but give genuine
fire within us to assure the continued progress toward
complete liberation for the establishment and expression of
all these values within our country?
To our God be all
honor and glory both now and forevermore!
In Jesus name we
do pray.
Amen!
October
25, 2006
Isn’t
It High Time that Everyone Vote in the Upcoming
Election?
But how then
should we vote?
After
all, to listen to politicians with claims and counterclaims
disposes us toward confusion and a sense of futility, does it
not?
But
perhaps we really need direction. If we seek to stay the
course and continue to make progress toward family and
Christian values, toward pro-life and moral and spiritual
liberties to express ourselves, etc., we certainly need to
know which candidates support our values. How can we
know?
A
little research may very well be in order. Check out
Vote Smart to learn where candidates stand on issues. That way each one of
us may vote his own convictions!
October
7, 2006
What
is Going on?
Shots ring out in our
schools, our troops fare poorly against a determined enemy
providing a costly setback in the battle against evil,
corruption surfaces in the high places in government and
elsewhere
–these
lead us toward the point of despair! Why? Indeed, what may we
conclude the significance of these popcorn-like occurrences
shocking our awareness with unrelenting frequency?
Has it ever
occurred to us that God may be calling to us? After all, is our
strength and security wrapped up in ourselves or in our
God? Indeed, do
we find that life is all about us or about our relationship
with our Almighty Creator and Redeemer? Isn’t it about time
for us to return to the God of our forefathers? Did not our
forefathers acknowledge God, not only in private life, but in
their public and political involvement?
Think about
that!
October
6, 2006
The
Gun Held to our Heads
Planed
Parenthood
must
find its smug, arrogant position a fairly secure one! After all,
we as taxpayers support their brazen, sadistic
enterprise against innocent unborn children with many millions
of dollars annually.
The sad fact remains that those of us who had rather
die ourselves than to give one single penny toward this
savagery are never given any choice in the matter
whatsoever. Uncle
Sam holds a gun to our heads, so to speak. We must pay taxes, for
if we refuse, our property becomes confiscated toward our tax
liability.
Allow
us to picture the dramatic, gory procedure we unwillingly
support. An
innocent, unborn child's very life can exist only at
the mercy of the mother. Every mother has been given an
option to have the unborn baby cruelly and excruciatingly
dismembered and murdered. The unborn child
simply has no recourse, no hope and no one to care about
the fact that this child is truly a unique,
God-created person. The executioners can
only play the role of God simply because they choose not to
believe there can even be a God at all. They care not that the
baby had no choice in coming into existence and cannot ever be
guilty of intruding into the womb of his mother. The mother herself
invited the child in through the choice of the sexual act,
except in the rare cases of rape. Yet,
even in rape the child had no choice in the matter. Is it right to punish
the child for the acts of
others?
The
greatest insult to us who grieve over such atrocities comes by
the slap of Uncle Sam to make support for this Nazi-like
organization mandatory!
Please pray that God Almighty will pass a
swift, harsh judgment against those responsibly for trashing
our nation upon the garbage heap of society! And pray
that our nation will mourn and turn to God through
repentence.
October
2, 2006
Some
Sobering Thoughts
When a
congressman has been exposed for his ethical and moral
corruption,
he
truly needs to face the consequences,
but to bring into question the family
and religious values he had been supporting in his legislative
disposition and stance really speaks of political
exploitation.
OK,
take out a dollar bill and examine it. In all probability, it
can be shown to be authentic. This does not negate
the fact that counterfeit dollars circulate in some measure in
our nation. Now,
does the existence of the counterfeit invalidate the real
dollar bill?
Absolutely not!
In like manner, does the support of family and
religious values by the corrupt congressman mean that family
and religious values should not receive consideration in the
legislative agenda?
May we dare suggest that by far the majority of decent
Americans would shout a resounding
NO! This sad and horrible
incident should not be an excuse to ignite a war against
decency and family and religious values. Christ Himself spoke
against such arrogant hypocrites by stating that they
strain at a gnat and swallow a camel These politicians who
exploit this kind of situation toward political ends may be
seen as those who would throw the baby out with the bath
water.
Indeed, that’s
really something to think about!
Sobering
Thoughts Postscript (October
3, 2006):
Certainly, while Rep.
Mark Foley should receive the full prosecution for his
criminal actions,
any
other person or persons privy to Rep. Foley’s criminal efforts
should also be held fully accountable for negligence or
failure to take appropriate actions. While many of us
agree with the forging of religious and family values through
the legislative process, we would never tolerate the
dastardly, underhanded breach of decency leading to the
breakdown of Christian and family values with respect to the
personal involvement of anyone, either conservatives or
liberals.
But to allow the truth
to explode into the consciousness of those who prefer to bask
in delusions, we seek to relate the obvious: THROUGHOUT HISTORY
EVERY DECENT AND WORTHY CAUSE DRAWS THOSE WHO, FOR ONE REASON
OR ANOTHER, BECOME THE TRAITORS OF THAT CAUSE!
Enough said. May those who will
heed digest this truth.
Furthermore,
we urge that we as Christians concerned about our freedoms
never fail to vote for those who have the same values based
within the Constitution of the
United
States,
even though there remains a risk of inadvertently voting for
some whose characters have been kept from public
knowledge.
September
26, 2006
Snips
of Newsworthy Events
The military chaplains
continue to suffer repression under the failure of the armed
forces to allow religious liberty and freedom of
speech.
Indeed,
defiance of the Constitution of the
United
States
continues to expand with impositions of a state
religion upon the chaplaincy. In restricting
chaplains from serving according to their religious
convictions and conscience to pray other than the government’s
bland prayer, the military authorities have destroyed much of
the effectiveness of chaplains. In failing to enact
legislation to correct this atrocity, the Senate apparently
does not wish to grant religious liberty to chaplains,
demanding that these chaplains comply with the restrictions
against their own hearts and character. Too bad that we
continue to lose our freedoms!
………
The threat of
some senators to resort to the filibuster against needed
appointees and against bills to ensure freedoms
reminds
us all that the elite minority demands to rule over the
majority. Just
where in the Constitution of the
United
States
do we have the faintest suggestion that the majority should
meekly surrender democracy in favor of autocracy by
aristocracy?
………
The United
Nations reminds
us constantly just how biased and duplicitous they can
be! Just about
the time we feel they have reached the very pits, new and
audacious depths signal their overall animosity against the
United States, Israel and democracies in general and their
hatred of Christian ethical and moral purity in
particular. The
support of international abortion
by the United Nations, for example, tags them as a force
of darkness and evil in our world. The United Nations has
become anything but an international forum to promote world
peace. As
a whole they demonstrate far more interest in hostile posture
against the West and favoritism extended toward terrorist
nations! Now, are we justified in
concluding that we live in a world torn by madness and
mindless enterprises? To
many of us it seems that the United Nations has become an
arm to eradicate the sovereingty of the United States and
Israel, as well as all other free countries. Perhaps their
transparent ploy toward establishing a world government should
be of grave concern to all of us. Or do we really want
to surrender our sovereignty to such a
monster?
September
15, 2006
Two Disasters Can Be
Warnings!
Katrina
and the 911 catastrophes (Katrina, a year ago from
the last part of August this year and the 911
attack, five years ago from this September 11) may well
have something crucial to say about our society and to our
society.
Indeed, in the course of a multiplicity of
uncontrollable assaults against our society and in a large
degree against our entire world, many of us seek some
sense to the utter mindless fanaticism driving fascist
radicals in a blitz of destructive mania. On top of this
furious, bewildering and desperate vulnerability that we
suffer in a world gone mad, we tend to beat our heads, as it
were, against a brick wall in a panic wishing to find
some sense or purpose, but to no avail. Out of this caldron
brews the brutal sadism of terrorists. As if this alone were
not far more than enough, a slap from the natural order
through hurricanes (such as Katrina and other deadly storms)
triggers questions that explode with rapid succession from our
unsettled minds
If there is a God, where is He in all this chaotic
whirlwind thrusting unbearable captivity upon
us?
Why does God not only ignore our plight, but also
ignore our cries?
How now do we move and find direction and purpose in
the midst of real threats to draw our whole world into a fatal
conflict?
It would be too easy for some Christians to withdraw
into a spiritual vacuum characterized by a denial of
accountability, which denial produces aloofness and a
judgmental and insensitive criticism of all others.
Even if these questions are based upon a false premise,
the expressions reflected through these questions can attest
to genuine concerns.
Some people seek desperately to cope with threats from
whatever level and background providing the frame of reference
for their responses or reactions. Therefore, to ignore
theses questions moves us to ignore the people whose needs
become evident through the search demonstrated by the
questions themselves.
Whether they are right or wrong must not be
the real issue.
The major concern for us all should be to reach out
with love and compassion to those who cry for help. While
issues are indeed important, they must be applied in a way to
help people, never to seal them within their plights.
In this light, allow us to consider these questions
within the scope of reaching out a hand of love and concern to
the people raising these
questions:
If there is a God, where is He in
all this chaotic whirlwind thrusting unbearable captivity upon
us?
First,
God does sometimes seem distant, greatly remote from our
desires to draw some sense of security and love that make our
journey through life meaningful. We should take courage
in knowing that the expression of our concerns can definitely
become the first step toward recovery (check the story of the
book of Job).
The
book of Job declares that God spoke to Job out of
the whirlwind! In other words, God
does not remove Himself from our deepest despair in life. From this we may
gather that our confusion and sense of disorientation and
detachment can never separate any of
us from the love of God (Romans, chapter 8). While Romans
specifically addresses Christians, Paul does not exclude
sinners from God’s love and concern, for Christ died for all,
the whole world.
However, everyone must come to a disposition to respond
to God’s outreach to be brought into His family (see
Salvation).
Second, since original sin and
the fall (Genesis, chapter 3), the
whole creation has been thrust into conflict between the
forces of light and the forces of darkness. The
fall pushes the complete realization and
fulfillment of God’s purpose into the future when God’s reign
and peace will cover the earth as the water covers the
sea. Thus, we
must contend with the curse, the plight of sickness,
loneliness, destitution and death during the normal course of
life.
Intermingled with the curse,
God’s presence brings joy, peace, meaning, love and
purpose. However,
we must come to realize that God’s perfect Kingdom cannot be
realized in this present world. Though we must be
faced with the whirlwinds of life, God can walk with us, as He
did with Job.
This in no way means that we must enjoy suffering and
all the ills brought upon us by the fall, but we can see
beyond the trials to the purpose God has when we keep our
focus on God.
Why does God not only ignore our
plight, but also ignore our cries? It is right to
cry! We ought to
express ourselves, whether we are right or wrong. The psalmists often
cried out to God to express great disappointment and sometimes
asked in so many words, God, where are you? How long will you not
hear us?
(Psalm 4, Psalm 6,
Psalm 13, etc).
To deny the obvious would become a slap against God
Himself. We must
do no less than to be transparent with ourselves and with God,
and we will find God big enough to embrace us in our honest
expressions.
But if that is the case, why natural
disasters that ravage our shores, such as Katrina, the “Act of
God,” so to speak?
We can halfway understand the onslaught of our enemies,
those who forge evil intent against us, but why does the hand
of God lash out against us?
Again, we must feel free to express our genuine
concerns. It’s
all part of being honest with our God. While none of us can
completely understand all the ways of God in His infinite
wisdom, we may clearly find clues within His Holy Word. First, to reiterate
strongly and emphatically what has already been declared
stoutly, God did not create His universe to include all the
evils we encounter, even in nature itself. Sin and the fall
brought a vast breach between God and His world. All humanity has been
alienated from God and in some measure dwells at enmity with
God (see Genesis, chapter 3 and following). Christ alone bridges
that gap and brings a process of transformation and
restoration, but we are never removed from the curse of the
fall, not until we pass from this life into the
next.
Second, God has not relinquished His control over the
natural order no more than He does over the affairs of people,
even though the fall has imposed the dreaded curse. Sure, God could have
prevented disasters such as Katrina unleashed against our
coastal areas.
But allow us to consider the fact that some elements
within our country, though in the minority, have banded
together to oppose any expression that would even acknowledge
God, and through certain judicially belligerent judges God has
been invited in no uncertain terms to leave our nation. In a measure, they
have been successful in kicking God out of our
nation. All the
Mighty Creator need do is to leave us to ourselves and
experience the consequences of our rejecting
Him!
Hence, repentance and confession as a nation can do
much to deliver us from the strong arm of some of the judicial
terrorism we have suffered. Honesty with God and
authenticity with each other can never be compromised without
intensifying our alienation from God.
Furthermore, we can never know what all remains
beneath the surface until we openly acknowledge our struggle
before our Creator, Sustainer and Redeemer. We can never become
more than what we are until we truly do become what we
are! That alone
can be the point of growth.
As we confess our hurt and our inability to make sense
in what we perceive to be our God’s neglect, genuine
communication can be established before this Mighty God of the
universe. Only
then can we be open to a new vision
through our crisis (Isaiah, the 6th
chapter). The
words “In the year that king Uzziah died…” represents a very
critical moment in history for Isaiah, for he lost what he
perceived to be a stabilizing influence in his world. Yet, through his
vision Isaiah found the genuine source of purpose and
stability, God alone.
While we cannot glibly pour out rivers of platitudes
and hope to resolve the turmoil produced by modern day
whirlwinds, we can be sensitive to the real problems unique to
our time frame in history and help people to focus beyond this
world and find the genuine fountainhead of peace and
direction. We can
eventually come to the place not to assess life in terms of
longevity and wellbeing, but in the ultimate purpose for our
existence.
However, this awareness can only be a process and may
never be completely achieved within this world.
How now do we move and find
direction and purpose in the midst of real threats to draw our
whole world into a fatal conflict? Again,
we must understand the reality of our entanglement within the
complex maze that has given rise to claims and counterclaims,
great conflicts of ideas and ideologies, bigotry and
sectarianism pushing to radical resorts, denial of absolutes
with assault on truth and reality, unprecedented egomania, and
the list moves infinitely into the deep abyss of total
rebellion against all that is right and decent. Absolutely, we find
ourselves in a major conflict whether we concede or not. Two forces continue to
clash, the dark forces of evil against light, truth and
reality (as found in Christ; see Salvation). This remains true in
spite of attempts to blur the line between right and
wrong.
Therefore, our purpose and direction in life can be
discovered through honesty. We must keep our eyes
opened in a world bent on deception and subterfuge. Righteous anger can
arouse us to take our stand on the battlefield and with
determination to eradicate the darkness and egomania, shouting
with conviction that truth and dedication can
overcome and silence the enemies of freedom and
right.
God has given us the battle cry and whether we live or
die in the commitment to truth and light can not be the
deciding factor, for those of us who really know God
understand that physical death simple ushers us into the glory
beyond this tainted world to everlasting
bliss.
August
27, 2006
Children Herded Off to Brainwashing
Exercises!
California’s
atrocious bills, if enacted, will rip children from
parental control altogether and make them an award of the
state.
So-called public schools will be no less
than modern day concentration camps to form robotic clones to
replicate the religion of homosexual
deviants in defiance of Christian and home
values.
Any opposition to the gay agenda
can be interpreted as “hate crimes”
and suffer the outrage of the new state-established religion
and can incur the
consequences!
Christianity will become greatly censored and
restricted severely under the new state dictatorship. Those who proclaim
Christianity will be branded as bigots because
of intolerance of the state religion. (Of course,
tolerance must be defined as agreeing
one-hundred percent with the state religion; any minute
disagreement must be branded as
intolerance!)
In
view of what could possibly happen, we may wonder about the
faults in California (such as
San Andreas
Fault) that
could produce unprecedented catastrophic upheavals to thrust
California
out into the Pacific
Ocean. While none of us would
wish all the innocent people to suffer such loss, it seems
that there are those in California
creating a political catastrophe which could indeed become
just as devastating as the physical catastrophe which is
already a very real threat!
August
22, 2006
ACLU
Rejoices!
Over this past
weekend, the
ACLU expressed great jubilation over the news
that U.S. District Judge
Anna Diggs Taylor in
Detroit declared the warrantless wiretapping practice to
preserve the security of our nation
unconstitutional!
So,
because the British successfully halted the terrorist plot
based on information received from warrantless
wiretapping, did the ACLU and some judges under the
disposition of judicial
tyranny
regret that the terrorists could not succeed against airliners
and consequently the ACLU and its sympathizers had to miss
out because of the thwarted fire works against the United
States and Britain?
And now they seek to insure that terrorist attempts to
destroy life and property in the future may indeed be
successful? Moreover, would such
judicial action not definitely represent the goals
of the ACLU? From its very inception has the ACLU
not promoted abuse of our national liberties as a
door through which to destroy our society? If
these questions imply a misrepresentation of the
modern-day ACLU and their judicial cohorts, many of us have
seen no hint of evidence to the contrary!
August
20, 2006
A
Senseless Decision!
The
senseless decision of a federal judge arouses
questions.
U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor in
Detroit
fell into the ignoble role of the first judge to strike down
the National Security Agency’s program using warrantless
surveillance.
Apparently, the so-called right of privacy
trumps the right of life—the right to
survive and thus represents a wide-open
invitation to terrorists to find a haven from which to launch
acts of terror against our government, our nation and our
people, including women and children. This decision flies in
the face of an overwhelming number of American citizens who
support that tool to gather information coming from terrorist
groups.
But if the judicial branch decides that the
gate of protection must be blasted open, every American
citizen finds himself at risk to lose a most valuable
heritage, that of survival. Perhaps
it’s no accident that the first right mentioned in
The Declaration of Independence is
life, not right of privacy to afford
any kind of haven for criminal acts against another’s very
existence.
Some would cry with Patrick Henry, “Give me liberty
or give me death!”
Yet, this cry does not insist on surrendering to an
enemy for the purpose of being executed. Rather, Patrick
Henry’s call became a commitment to stand up to the enemy to
protect liberty, even at a real risk of dying for the cause of
freedom. In other
words, it would be far better facing death than to lose
liberty. Those
American soldiers of today who willingly fight the terrorists
at the real risk of dying to protect our liberties do not seek
to end their own lives but would be betrayed by a nation whose
judicial enemies within our government would nullify the
gallant efforts of those brave soldiers by surrendering our
national security to aid and enable that enemy!
But
then we are left to wonder about the motive. Right of privacy can
be found in the Constitution of the
United
States
within the context of supporting freedom from undue searches
and seizure that could establish coercive pressure to support
a move toward total government control over personal actions
and beliefs, but right of privacy was never
intended to provide criminal abuse with impunity.
However,
there remain organizations within our
America
which from the very inception have declared as their principal
purpose the destruction of our society by using our liberties
to defeat us.
Makes one wonder, doesn’t
it?
August
7, 2006
Disturbing
Reaction!
The
enormously disappointing reaction
by the Shiites, who demonstrated with open
hostile shouts and militant intent toward
Israel
and the United
States
in Iraq recently, could be heard throughout the streets in
Baghdad. They gestured and
exploded with heated cries, “Death to
Israel! Death to
America!”
in open support of the Hezbollah.
What a turnaround! These masses
constituted many who supported the liberation forces to
release the people from the years of tyranny under which they
had suffered untold atrocities. What
happened?
While the coalition forces found themselves preoccupied
with flushing out terrorist insurgence throughout Iraq, the
enemy embarked on a two-prong approach. They forged ahead with
terrorists’ acts and, at the same time, with a keen, deceptive
resort to underhanded propaganda to win the minds of the
people by inaccurate representation, and even outright lying,
in misreporting of events.
Terrorists could never bring reasoning to the table,
for their arguments could never stand up to scrutiny. Thus, they seek to
divert from truth and create their own brand of so-called
reality. Hence,
they resort to force, to killing, to eradicating all
opposition by ethnic and religious cleansing and by promoting
lies!
Let us commit to earnest prayer these deceived
people. May the
Light of Jesus Christ pervade their minds and
hearts!
Follow-up
Analysis as of August
17, 2006:
The
Hezbollah, the Hamas, Al-Qaeda and every
other fascist bigot, operative under terror forged in the name
of their god, tend to arouse ire and resentment in every
decent and honest person. Nevertheless, we need
to guard ourselves from resorting to some of the same evil
tactics enshrined within the darkness providing the impetus
for acts of terror.
We should realize quite readily that we can never
successfully fight terror with terror no more than we can ever
dissipate lies with other lies! In other words, we
cannot be terrorists ourselves such that we can resist other
terrorists.
To
put it on another level, we must be unwavering proponents of
truth with an absolute, uncompromising posture. Truth alone will
vindicate us and liberate us from the soil and slime hurled at
us by our enemies who seek to destroy us in hope of destroying
the truth we represent.
Historically,
truth coupled with genuine love for our enemies,
but at the same time expressing zero tolerance for their
terror tactics, have won a few of the enemy
combatants. This
provides proof that God uses genuine love and care to reach
the hearts of some of the worst enemies on the face of the
earth. That alone
vindicates our efforts.
July
25, 2006
Over
the Edge!
The
turmoil afflicting the world scene between
Israel
and the terrorists
tends to escalate over the edge, bringing
our world toward an all-out conflict.
Yet, much has
been made over the loss of innocent lives with the explicit
blame falling on Israel’s indiscretions, but scarcely a word
has been uttered respecting the fact that the Hezbollah
embed themselves within the shield of the innocent civilian
populace as an intended haven from which to strike innocent
people, including women and children, in Israel! Of course,
if Israel
effectively defends itself, the lateral loss of civilian lives
cannot be avoided.
But
our point has no intention to arouse hatred of the dreaded
Hezbollah. Quite
unlike the terrorists, we seek to reach out in love to any and
all people, even when anger over great criminal acts against
humanity wells within us. We need to pray for
our enemies, that they may be delivered from this madness and
hateful delusion! We
detest strongly what they do to themselves and
others.
July
6, 2006
Oops, Your Slip is Showing!
As
our Independence Day passed,
something else also passed in
the back allies of the federal court in
Iowa—a
severe blow to Chuck Colson’s prison
ministries.
Can we imagine?
Wow! Judge
Robert Pratt concluded that such ministries should have never
received tax monies.
He concluded such a practice to be (and get this!) a
major violation of separation
of church and state,
also known as the
establishment clause. Every
penny received by prison ministries from the government
must be repaid, if this verdict stands on appeal.
You know, because of prison ministries we just
guess such a high percentage of actually transformed and
decent prisoners must indeed be too shocking to accept. When turned loose on
society these former prisoners, for the most part, become
constructive contributors to society. Yet, we are given to
understand they should have been left alone so that a far
greater amount of tax payer money would have to be absorbed
because of more numerous crimes and more costly crime control
than had been dedicated to transforming and redirecting
criminals to become useful and law abiding citizens! Yeah, that really
makes good sense, doesn’t it?
Surely, our forefathers who insisted on acknowledging
God and unapologetically based our democracy upon biblical
principles, including the
Ten Commandments, might just suffer
from traumatic shock if they could observe how some officials
within our current society have idolized the separation of
church and state as a tool of hostility against
Christianity, the very basis of our government and political
mandates.
Of course, our forefathers intended to
approve a principle that our government could not endorse a
certain denomination within the Christian community as the
official religion of our nation. Quite the contrary,
they intended most emphatically that the government keep hands
off all religions such that religions have unfettered and free
expressions and influence, even upon the nature and
disposition of how our own democracy functions. That influence bears
significance, not to define the religious content of the
government, but to determine that the government might retain
Christian principles, such that no one should steal, kill,
bear false witness, etc.
Then, why does Chuck Colson become singled
out because he exercises through prison ministries
a constructive and positive influence upon our
society by such efforts?
We don’t know.
Why doesn’t someone ask?
Additional comments on
Oops,
Your Slip is Showing!
as of
July 14,
2006:
OK,
then, some other thoughts have crashed into our consciousness
with respect to the court action against Chuck Colson and his
prison ministries.
In the turmoil in the Middle
East
with respect to rocket attacks on
Israel,
we see some of the very same resort to terror which could also
sweep our own country.
First steps have been taken by some court
decisions to eradicate civilized
principles from our society. Christianity and
Christian principles have truly promoted civilized standards
and civilized order throughout history, and to purge Christian
principles and remedies from our society would indeed thrust
us into turmoil and leave us vulnerable to terror tactics and
dispositions.
Just
consider how far the courts could go in purging Christianity
and Christian principles from the
United
States,
since they have already set precedence to forge ahead. They could assault
laws that have to do with stealing, falsification and even
murder, simply because such laws are built upon Christian
principles, especially through the Ten Commandments! Have we not truly
opened a Pandora’s Box?
June
29, 2006
Unfortunate!
The
Supreme Court of the
United
States
has succumbed to the desires of the terrorists!
The Supreme Court today blocked
Bush war crimes trials for Guantanamo detainees. These
detainees have never been US citizens and have been
notoriously guilty of war crimes against US soldiers and even
against women and children. Indeed, do they deserve to
waste tax payers' money, our time and efforts and tie up our
court systems? Have they not already insulted us
and our decency and even all humanity by their
treacherous crimes against the whole of humanity? What
some spineless, morally destitute justices we have!
Nevertheless, we do appreciate the minority of the justices
who had the guts to stand for
right.
June
8, 2006
The 48 Will Go Down in Infamy!!!!!!!
These 48 Senators have created
more havoc than all the forces of evil from the
terrorists!
These villains within the
Senate have mocked the vast majority of American desires to
establish a traditional and wholesome value of marriage, and
in so doing they have sacrificed our whole society and culture
upon the whims of those who are determined to make the concept
of marriage null
and void and ultimately eradicate all definitions of marriage
such that marriage can mean anything anyone wants it to
mean. That’s precisely the
fast track to destruction these treacherous Senators have
unconscionably proposed to force upon everyone with absolutely
no consideration for the desires of the majority of the
American people!
Most Americans should be well
aware of the red herrings some of these Senators have thrown
into the course of the debate. Granted, DOMA (Defense of
Marriage Act) has been a measure on a congressional level to
legislate a definition of marriage defined as the union
between one man and one woman. But these Senators
most certainly know that DOMA can be declared
unconstitutional by a renegade judge at some point, thereby
effectively nullifying DOMA. Consider what happened
in
Massachusetts,
where the State Supreme Court initiated a bogus legislation
against the traditional interpretation of marriage!
We further realize quite well
that in some cases the courts under the crass agenda of
certain defiant judges have made decisions in total and
unmitigated contempt for the Constitution of the
United
States in full violation of
that Constitution.
Some may rightfully ask What’s to keep these
judges from ignoring or acting in contempt of the Constitution
of the United
States to defy such a marriage
amendment?
Good question, but allow us to pose another
question: Should we decline to make
an effort through a marriage amendment to confirm traditional
marriage as the official marriage even if the courts may
exercise such judicial tyranny? Quite true, we
should. It may be
possible to appeal to the Supreme Court of the
United
States and reverse such a
lower court decision.
If not, there could erupt such public outrage that
judges would be forced to step down. Such a possibility may
be slim, but even such a slim chance makes it worth the
struggle to correct this gross miscarriage of
justice!
Numerous other political rubbish
have filtered cunningly into the Senators’ debates, but all
have the net effect of supporting the effort to abolish
traditional marriage as a legitimate and protected
right.
Hence,
our downfall as a nation and a society moves dangerously
near, thanks to the traitors within it, who can
succeed in a brief moment to do what may otherwise take many
years for the terrorists alone to do. At least with the
terrorist we have a chance for victory, but not with those who
sell our country out from within!
Does
this not dramatically point out the great need for our country
to have genuine people in the Senate who have moral fiber and
backbones to stand up for what is right, statesmen who are
willing to face hell, if necessary, to demand their ground
against the dark proponents of satanic evil, those with
the guts of our forefathers who stood for right
and would gladly give their lives to defend that
right?
This observation presents a very
moderate reflection compared to the burning disgust at the
contempt those 48 Senators bear against the true
America
in which we grew up.
It’s passed time that we stand up and be counted, that
we pray that God would move to bring back the
America
we once knew!
June
3, 2006
Belligerent Treason Against True Marriage
Thank you Senators for showing
your true colors even more dramatically! Some Senators perceive our
United
States citizens to be
blithering idiots, and treat us as such. Some of these
two-faced, underhanded politicians filled with
capara have
sold us down the river by claiming to be pro family while
determined to betray us by voting against the
marriage amendment. Oh, they mince with
worthless expressions, such as it’s a state’s right
matter. Of
course, they would love to sell us out under that ploy, for
the states have no rights against the current court
system which calls all the shots. These Senators well know
that but depend on our stupidity to swallow such
a line as that.
To those decent Senators who fight for our cultural,
family and constitutional rights and values, we encourage you
to stand in there with the full knowledge of our support. We hope the coming
elections will weed out these vicious traitors who seek to
sell us out. But
nothing they do can keep us from praying for them as well as
others. We pray
that the LORD will get hold of their hearts and minds.
May
8, 2006
Hostilities Surge Ever More Openly and Blatantly
Against Christianity
Watch it, Ninth Circuit
Court!
The war memorial to veterans
happens to be the
Mt.
Soledad cross in
San Diego. The Federal Judge has
ordered it removed, come hell or high water, simply because of
extraordinary hostilities toward Christianity, irrespective of
the fact that it is
generic and non-specific concerning any denomination and
even has a specific historical setting! This kind of hostility
which seeks to purge any hint of Christian influence upon our
history is a blistering affront to all that our Constitution
and founding fathers stood for and demonstrates unconscionable
breach of justice and pompous contempt for all decency and
truth. But then, what else is
new?
Please let us all engage in earnest and forthright
prayer for these enemies of Christianity. The Bible teaches us
to pray for our enemies, that they may have a change of
heart.
May
3, 2006
You
Mean, Don’t Let the Truth Be Spoken?
What are they afraid of? Bill HR-235
has as its intention to put a halt to censorship of Houses of Religious
Worship.
Restoration of freedom of speech
should have never been necessary, but the violation of
religious liberty and free speech came as an attachment to a
bill in 1965 with the intention of silencing ministers who
sought to bring to light certain ills resorted to by the
political process to threaten the principles of liberty and
justice. Thus,
the proposed bill in Congress, Bill HR-235, should be
considered and passed immediately by the Congress of the
United
States to
correct this gross miscarriage of justice.
What are they afraid of,
indeed? Quite honestly, to
many of us it would seem that the extreme liberals have much
to lose when the
truth is readily spoken. For this reason, every
one of us should go to this web address and sign a
petition to urge Congress to pass this vitally important
bill:
http://www.aclj.org/
April
19, 2006
A
Sleeping Dog Refuses to Roll Over and Play
Dead
OH, THE DISGUST OF IT ALL!
Yet, those of us who have dared tread lightly in hopes
of keeping the sleeping dog pacified and fast asleep become a
trifle irritated at the notion that those of us who promote
family values and a culture of life can be lulled into a false
sense of security at the brief intervals of silence from the
raging opponents.
But let us awaken from our
own slumber and once again face reality! Evil will never roll over and play dead, but by its
very nature will seek to destroy all who fight for decency,
good and justice.
Every pro-life,
pro-family and
religious liberty advocate must
wage a constant, persistent and intelligent
warfare against all forces of darkness.
Take, for
example, the California Legislature’s concocting a very black
and dastardly anti-family measure totally repudiating almost
all family values, expressed in a public demand to brainwash
every public school child, not merely to tolerate so-called same-sex marriages but to
embrace the gross practice as very legitimate and desirable
for anyone who may feel the slightest interest in pursuing
that lifestyle.
No one may be exempt. Not even the most
dedicated religious reasons can allow any child to be excluded
from the textbooks which picture same-sex couples carrying on
family responsibilities, nor from classes which demand to
brainwash the children.
The children become the award of the state, somewhat
like Communist Russia used to do and Adolph Hitler’s
Germany
practiced! The
parents have no real rights. The State of
California
already can scarcely recognize any degree of religious liberty
in their legal disposition, and perhaps they seek to place the
final nail in the coffin of Christianity.
If this measure
succeeds in become law in
California, that
State will become so very alien to a democracy that it can
have little or no affinity with many of the other States of
the United
States.
But another state,
that of Hawaii,
has already introduced the most heinous license to murder to
every so-called
clinic and medical facility in
Hawaii. It makes every unborn
child a hostage to the mother’s whim and expands these crimes
against humanity to the paradise, such that
the once beautiful and sweet spirit of
Hawaii has
soured into the blackness of hell and can no longer be a
paradise.
May we ever
remain alert and never take the sleeping dog for
granted.
But please,
let us pray for
California and
Hawaii.
April
3, 2006
A Matter of
Tolerance
Of course, it
is indeed a matter of tolerance. Toward the end of March this year an impressive 25,000
evangelical Christian youth invaded the darkness of San
Francisco with a glimmer of light which truly sparked outcries
of resentment and name-calling, not only by protestors, but
even by city officials who called such references to truth
“loud, obnoxious, disgusting” and invited this group upholding
family and traditional values who laid their claim to free speech to get
out of San Francisco. This
youth rally, daring to believe everyone should be able to
voice ideas and beliefs freely, found themselves being
assaulted as fascist.
Yeah! Can’t we just see it? Sure, the city that
prides itself as being most tolerant will
throw out the welcome mat for everyone who subscribes to every
tiny letter of the way it dictates policy and beliefs. But dare to exercise
free speech and
deviate one degree from its pro-gay, pro-abortion,
anti-American, anti-family, anti-tradition and bigoted views
and that city will move heaven and earth to see that we who
exercise free speech are
railroaded out of their sight as much as possible.
Well,
true Christians from the time of Christ have been willing to
dialogue openly with all facts on the table. But cities like
San
Francisco which
are terrified to expose their ideas to all the light must
protect their brand of tolerance that
they may continue to exist. Yes, Christians must
continue to love their enemies, even those who dare not allow
any opposition or opposing ideas. We dare say that some
of them may be troubled over the idea that we do not fight
back with dirty tricks, but turn the other cheek. Keep praying for
San
Francisco.
March 22, 2006
A Matter of
Truth
Those who despise the truth
are more likely to conceal it, but those
who love the truth
are vindicated by its revelation! We who desire to place
all matters on the table for dialogue wince at what goes on in
the new Afghan government’s legal procedures against
Abdul Rahman, a former Moslem converted to Christianity. This matter becomes
especially troubling since the supposedly new democratic
government agreed to the human rights (right to exercise
ideas, religious preferences, etc.) and then applied an old
Moslem law which made the death penalty mandatory for any
Moslem converted to Christianity. Is this practice what
our soldiers fought for in the movement to liberate
Afghanistan? If so, who changed the
meaning of liberation?
And also, if this is true, can there be any meaningful
and basic difference between the old regime and the new
government? If
such is indeed the case, the entire military effort and the
lives lost were all for naught!
Just
maybe that government needs to be placed on trial for breach
of contract in signing onto human rights and then
violating them in the litigation against Abdul Rahman! There should be an
outcry from every decent nation on the face of the earth. Definitely, reprisals
should be forged against this government which gained its
power through false pretense.
And to add insult to injury, some
officials in that country speak of crimes in our country, the
United States, such as same-sex marriages. While many of us in
the United States consider those same-sex marriages false and
absolutely wrong, those of us who oppose that practice (and
over half Americans statistically disapprove of same-sex
marriages) we can cry out without fear of being put to death
for our opposition.
We do not even consider putting to death here in the
United
States people of any other faith or those
converted to Islam.
If the Afghan people want the truth, let them see the
entire truth!
March 16, 2006
A Question Worth
Considering
A recent question has been
raised.
This question has far-reaching
significance and deserves to be brought to front and
center.
Allow us to set the
stage, if we may.
We quickly align
ourselves with many devoted and untiring defenders of
religious liberties and family values. For that, we make
absolutely no apology.
Nor do we ever have a fleeting thought that we would
limit our support for these gallant warriors of the
faith. Our nation
finds itself greatly indebted to these who continually
sacrifice to assure our Christian heritage.
Yet, at the same time, we must exercise
extreme care to disallow elements of compromise to weaken our
stance. We do not
believe that some of these elements have entered into the
equation consciously, much less with malicious intent.
While many of us
greatly value the unique position of each State of the United
States and consequently support States Rights, we
do subscribe to the understanding that there are definitely
overriding principles of human rights that must be recognized by all
States.
As an example, civil rights
cannot be altered or ignored by any State of the
United
States as it pertains to
racial segregation. This has already been
settled through civil rights pursuits and established by the
Supreme Court of the United
States.
However, when we seek to fight for the rights of
the unborn children, a class of human beings just
as real and deserving as any other class, the notion of a
reversal of Roe vs. Wade at
the Supreme Court level may simply refer the matter to be
settled in each individual State cannot be considered a
complete victory.
Can we really settle for that
miscarriage of justice? The rights of the
unborn child cannot find less support than on a national level
any more than racial segregation should be settled by each
individual State.
Is that not true? In each case,
we deal with human beings, do
we not?
Therefore, may we continue the battle to the very end
and make sure that the right to life is a national, not merely
a State, issue!
March
11, 2006
A
Sad Day for the State of
South
Carolina
From a release of
information we learn
that a certain school district (or districts) within the state
of South Carolina wanted to receive direction from the South
Carolina State Department of Education with respect to the
possibility of presenting the theory of evolution within the
classrooms using critical analysis, to allow students to
view the pros and cons of the theory of evolution itself. Quite unfortunate and
disturbing, the State Department of Education elected to
advise the school district(s) to forego any such approach, to
leave the teaching of evolution as is.
Really, the
pursuit of scholastic studies has historically been based on
the liberty of students to examine any and all aspects of
relevant subject matter and never to approach education from a
closed, censured disposition. But then, we seem to
confront the lords of the academic field who fear exposing
certain philosophical assumptions to all light. Apparently, they
consider hedging the students into a single groove such that
their evolutionary philosophy will be protected, that
evolutionary assumptions is never exposed to the full
truth. This truly
points to the kind of protectionism the educational community
cannot easily afford to ignore!
Can it be so much that some
educators find themselves reluctant to open up evolution to full
light because they fear what truth could reveal? Do they desire to
protect their sacred
cow which they value as a religious shrine to assure the
promotion of their specific brand of student
indoctrination?
May we
ponder these questions as we seek to prod the educational
elite to bring all facts to the
table!
March
7, 2006
Enters the Geography Teacher, Mr. Jay
Bennish!
A cry from the master demands
attention. The
roar of the mighty lion leaves little doubt that the message
creates its own brand of truth, indeed if
truth can bear the resemblance to creative imagination.
HOWEVER, rather
than resorting to volumes concerning the many aspects Jay
Bennish brought to the table, we wish to zero in on one aspect
of the master’s
presuppositions, if we may. His glaring renunciation
of Bush and the United
States with stark comparison
to Adolph Hitler’s
Germany
and that nation’s historical determination to export its rule
over the whole world may, in the books of some, deserve no
response such that dignity is not given to such
a brutal claim.
That would be alright, except that we fear that Jay
Bennish’s brand of truth has
a serious base among a few, but significant number, of
American citizens.
Jay Bennish
declared that Hitler sought to impose his rule on the whole
world. In so many
words, Mr. Bennish concluded that the
United
States sought to do the very
same thing, export democracy to other countries of the world,
including
Iraq. But here is something
that Mr. Bennish omitted altogether: Hitler’s
Germany sought to suppress the
world’s countries and subject them to serve
Germany’s purposes only. On the other
hand the
United
States and its allies seek to
let the people of each nation determine their own
government!
It seems that Mr. Bennish proposes that tyranny,
repressive governments, dictatorial regimes, etc., where
people have absolutely no say so in the government, should be
tolerated, no matter how many people are brutally killed or
tortured within those governments' nations.
Furthermore, since the attack upon the
United
States by terrorists in
New York and
Washington, Mr.
Bennish concludes that we provoked these attacks by failing to
acknowledge the so-called rightful existence of these
terrorists’ nations.
Absolutely, this seems to be his conclusion from his
presuppositions.
Certainly, our
democracy has never achieved perfection. We may well be
reminded of what Winston Churchill declared about
democracies. The only governments that
are worse than a democratic form of government are all those
non-democratic forms of
government.
March
2, 2006
The
Howl of the Exposed
A clamor rolls endlessly into the
darkness, but truth cannot
succumb to the proponents of the culture of
death!
Indeed, the abortionists must shiver at the prospects
that the Supreme Court of the United States may render a
sound, sensible decision reflecting the Constitutional
principles upon which our nation found a new birth, a birth of
freedom, giving liberty not only to mothers, but to the dismay
of some pompous members of the feminists movements, also
under the Constitution rightfully and equitably extending
liberty to the unborn child.
Really, now, can we bring ourselves to imagine
treating an unborn child as a human being? Would we suggest that
the unborn child does not bear the guilt and audacity of
intruding into the woman’s womb when the woman despises such
an invasion?
Should not the mother have a right to exercise extreme
reprisals against that tiny criminal for daring to take up his
abode in the woman’s flesh, even in spite of the fact that
through the sexual act the prospective mother extended that
invitation to the child?
Please excuse
many of us if we prefer to have a much more humane view of the
unborn child, this human being who can in no wise defend
himself, this child who has never committed any crime, this
child who is suppose to know that he is unwanted! Yet, we do not cast
him aside, but would fight to secure the same rights everyone
else has. Just
what is
un-American and wrong with
this picture?
Should the mother have greater rights than the
unborn child? As
with legalized murder of the Jews in Adolph Hitler’s
Germany,
should abortion (euphemism for infanticide) continue to have
its barbaric legal status protected?
May we make a
suggestion to those who promote such flimsy defense of
abortion
that they put forth every effort to break the shell of their
pompous, conceited bigotry and look outwardly to discover what
genuine love, concern and truth can reveal? After all, a great,
new world beyond the inner circle of their impoverished
existence beckons with thrilling challenges, all sorts of
possibilities that flourish in new, glorious relationships, even exciting
relationships with the growing, unborn
child!
In any event, please, may we fall in love with truth
and keep ourselves prompted with reality
checks!
February
14, 2006
A
Reminder of a Difference
As
we consider what day this is,
Valentine’s
Day, we may wish
to reflect upon the bitter, rebellious terrorists whose whole
philosophy leads to violence, for only hatred governs. These blind people
cannot tolerate the truth, for their whole perspective gears
them toward an effort to eradicate truth. They cannot possibly
defend themselves rationally; thus, they must resort to the
murder of everybody else, including women and children. Moreover, it can be
little wonder that these people of darkness erupted with
violence against the cartoon portraying an aspect of truth,
though not very tactful and not very sensitive. The cartoon sought to
show that terror resides inherently within the Islamic
religion, especially as an opportunity for those already
filled with hatred to attempt to justify their radical
behavior.
Hence, love,
from a Christian perspective, will always be an
alien concept to these poor, radical Moslems. Quite diametrically
opposed to the philosophy of hatred, true Christians would
gladly reach out a loving hand to these radical terrorists, if
even the slightest chance were provided to do so. Real Christians do not
hate Moslems, even though many Moslems detest Christians and
seek to eradicate them.
While many other Moslems do not share in the radical
agenda of the terrorist, Christians would like to reach out to
the terrorists in genuine love, without endorsing in any
fashion the darkness they embrace which leads them to seek the
destruction of everyone else.
May we pray
for these radical groups that somehow they will also come to
the same light that a few radicals have over the years come
to. The few who
have come to embrace the love of Christ are now driven by the
force of that love rather than the force of hatred and
darkness.
New addition on
February 15,
2006 to this
A
Reminder of a Difference: A postscript to
this article may need to be posted here to clarify a certain
Christian perspective.
Genuine Christian concern does not dictate responding
in kind. Often
throughout the world Christianity has been taken to task by
every conceivable measure from murder and persecution of
Christians to caricatures demeaning Christians and Christian
beliefs. The more
radical Islamic groups have especially resorted to these
tactics in an effort to destroy Christians and Christian
beliefs.
Yet, Christians do not respond in
kind, but seek to bring to the table open and honest dialogue
such that the truth may be established. We turn the other
cheek in the Spirit of Jesus Christ, Who gave His life that
every sinner, no matter how bad, may find salvation. Islamic radicals are
no exception.
That God can love even those who
kill innocent ones such as babies out of hatred speaks more
than volumes. How
God can love them troubles some people. We may be reminded of
a true story told of a young man a number of years ago. He sought to clean an
outside window of his home as his mother watched at a
distance. The
ladder he stood on while cleaning the outside window had been
placed on top of the septic tank. No one was aware of a
faulty structure on top of the septic tank until the top gave
way. The young
man fell into the slime of the septic tank.
We can only imagine the horrible
experience both the young man and his mother had at such
a repulsive adhesive covering the body of the victim. Needless to say, it
took a lot of cleaning to bring the lad back to an acceptably
decent status.
Would we think that the mother
hated the slime that covered her son? Why, of course we
would. Would we
think that the mother hated the son who ended up that
way? Why, of
course not.
Then, do we hate the filthy
actions and cruel terror the radical Islamic
people inflict on our world? Of course we do. Do we hate the
terrorists themselves?
Of course, we do not. God can clean them up
as the son was cleaned after falling into the septic
tank. We pray
toward that end, do we not?
February
2, 2006
CONGRATULATIONS!
Judge Samuel A. Alito’s appointment confirmation
to the Supreme Court has been no less than an outstanding
victory against the forces of elitists’ determination to
defeat our constitutional form of government. May our nation
forever retain its original character against enemies from
without and enemies from within. Congratulations,
Justice Samuel A. Alito.
January
22, 2006
You Called It!
Calling
attention to the tragedy of Roe v. Wade ruling by the Supreme
Court, a group of pro-life protesters, some with signs reading
Women deserve better than abortion, were greeted
along the street with pro-abortion advocates waving clothes
hangers and shouting , “Bigots, go home!”
Unfortunately,
these bigots waving clothes hangers and shouting would not go
home. Of course, their message
could only include themselves, since they were the ones
exercising bigotry against unborn
children!!!
New as of January 26, 2006:
Oh, yes.
We do know about the symbolic nature of the clothes
hangers.
IF
there were no
abortion clinics (ironic to call death houses
clinics), there could be no assured safe way
for pregnant mothers to kill their unborn
children.
They would have to resort to back alley
illegal and unsafe houses. Indeed, perhaps unsafe with respect to the health of
the mother, but about 100% unsafe for the
baby, even in so-called abortion clinics. Talk
about real bigotry!
And if we do that and if we
are fair to all, suppose we make it possible for
potential bank robbers to learn how to kill policemen and
others carefully to assure their safety in a
bank robbery.
How about that for a sure dose of reality? Huh? What difference is
there in principle anyway?
|
